Envi II

In the new round, we discuss environmental issues again. We now look at the loss of biodiversity caused by human pollution. We hear a strong defense speech laying out the package of policies proposed by the committee. 

In the first attack speech, we are taught about the financial impact of limiting areas for fishing and agriculture. 

In the next speech we are told that there have been many attempts to subsidize already, and that it might be more effective to focus on restrictions. 

The parliament seems eager to point out mistakes in this committee's resolution. In the first round of debate a delegate questions how the committee plans to select the types of farms that should be restricted. Immediately we see a direct response from the defending committee, pointing out that it aims to restrict only the unsustainable monofarming.

The committee responses:

On the question of how to combat overfishing and overuse of land, the committee answers that we must limit consumption. 

open round 2

Again, many good points were raised in this debate. One delegate wonders why the committee still doesn't completely eliminate monofarming. Also, a delegate is worried about the incomes that are dependent on the types of agriculture the committee wants to combat.

The committee answers with an original solution. Vertical expansion will not lead to more land useage, but it can still provide for more output. Also they state that incomes are not in danger for farmers who are willing to switch to more sustainable methods.

3

In the third round, an unprecedented chain of direct responses occurs. A delegate from ENVI I states that pesticides will always kill animals, so they limit diversity by nature. Direct response from the defending committee: natural pesticides kill only some insects and are far less harmful than artificial pesticides. Again there is a direct response: a delegate from FEMM fears that the natural pesticides are not affordable for all farmers. A fourth comment: natural pesticides can lead to healthier crops and therefore healthier citizens. 

Summation speech

The delegate summarizes some of the concerns. Although trees take long to grow, we must be patient if we want to restore biodiversity. Also, the costs of certain taxes, are balanced by subsidies. The delegate reminds us that our current way of living is destroying biodiversity. We must fight overfishing, if we want to ensure food safety.  With persuasive words, we are called upon to vote in favor of their resolution.

With great pleasure the board anounces that with 22 votes in favor, the resolution has passed!